Writing rules: what to ignore and what to follow

Like any craft there are rules for prose writing. There are formal grammar rules, but there are also other rules for fiction, some good, some slightly ridiculous. I’ve selected a few rules to demonstrate that the rules of writing are never straight forward and there are always exceptions.

Write “authentic” dialogue

I once wrote a story for a nonfiction course I was doing. Each student was required to write a narrative of a true event and to be as accurate as possible, down to quoting individuals. I wrote about a helicopter pilot (Jack) who’d taken my family and me up to Fox Glacier in New Zealand. In the narrative, I relayed Jack’s commentary as we ascended and landed on the glacier. His words were etched in my mind so I wrote verbatim what he’d said. After posting the narrative online for group review, one student said that he didn’t believe Jack’s dialogue, telling me ‘he’d never say that’. I was very diplomatic in reminding him that this was an account of an actual event with an actual person and that my step-father could verify the events and his statements, but he was convinced people don’t talk that way – that Jack’s explanations weren’t authentic. This puzzled me until I realised that many writer’s experiences with written dialogue have been through fiction rather than nonfiction. I wanted to ask him what “authentic dialogue” meant, but I suspected he wouldn’t be able to tell me. Spoken dialogue is often unrehearsed, clipped or broken, contains redundancies or obvious statements like “nice weather”, and is often clichéd. To mimic every day speech in fiction would be to break too many other rules of fiction, so rather than try to write authentic dialogue, we should concentrate on writing effective dialogue that compliments the story. Effective dialogue

  • avoids formalities and technical language unless it is relevant to the story or character;
  • reflects character idiosyncrasies
  • reflects language and speech diversity
  • identifies speakers
  • can use body language or gestures to compliment the dialogue
  • avoids character’s indulging in self-aggrandising, since it is unnatural for most of us to do this
  • should at times be inappropriate, provocative and even irrational
  • should balance with the prose and not seem like an interruption with each new quotation mark

For more information on dialogue read On dialogue in fiction

Avoid cliches

Clichés can turn a good novel into a colourless and flat work and reflects the authors laziness. They can even reflect a writers ignorance. By clichés I mean overused phrases, cliches involving characters, clichéd scenes, even genre clichés. Some cliches are more obvious than others and are easily avoided. It’s the sneaky ones you need to look out for, so to avoid clichés:

  • write originally all the time
  • don’t use archetypal heroes and villains (Prince Charming, or the Wicked Witch) or stereotype personalities (a “nutty professor”)
  • Avoid racial or national stereotypes everywhere
  • avoid writing prosaic death scenes, love scenes, birthing scenes (I recently read a book where I felt like the same birthing scene was repeated several times throughout the book, only using slightly different words each time)
  • avoid genre-specific clichés like the murderous butler in crime fiction or alien invaders in sci-fi fiction, or damsel in distress in romantic fiction. Of course, if you can come up with an original slant on any of these overused plots there’s no reason it can’t be written.

Sometimes you might find clichés unavoidable – such as character dialogue (although one of my lecturers even said we should avoid this), but mostly cliché should be cast-off.

Exclamation points

Exclamation points are like little bee stings at the end of the line. In prose writing they’re redundant. For example,

“Don’t leave!” he shouted.

Experienced writers use language to convey mood, meaning and tone rather than punctuation marks, like exclamations, or tags for that matter. Which brings me to the next rule:

Show, don’t tell

Anton Pavlovich Chekov rather eloquently said “Don’t tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass”. Today, the show don’t tell mantra is too often quoted and has become a bit of an obsession for writers. It is true that readers don’t want to be told that a sunset is pretty, we want to experience it, but some writers have taken this to the extreme. The prose becomes overburdended with sensory words, gestures and lengthy pontificating. Showing is a skill all writers need to learn and employ, but sometimes it is enough to say that the smell was like raw sewerage rather than trying to give the reader a complete olfactory experience. The wisdom is in knowing when to show and when to tell.

The mantra should be show and tell

Sentence size

The general rule for fiction writing is to avoid lengthy sentences and never to use sentence fragments or one word sentences. Long sentences can be hard work to write, much less to read. Generally long sentences are a device employed by more formal documents (like legal notices and contracts, science and university texts). Still, some fiction writers have a preference for a slightly longer than average sentence. The rule of sentence fragments or one word sentences, on the other hand, seems to be increasingly ignored in contempary fiction, at least in the kind of fiction I read. Sometimes small sentences are more effective than lengthy ones, and some writers use this to stylise their writing. It’s up to the individual writer to decide on the shape of each sentence. The trick is to balance short sentences or sentence fragments by using them in combination with long (though not excessive) sentences.

Fact or fallacy: Write what you know

I’ve gotten myself into such a state with my novel that the whole process has stalled in a spectacular way. Here’s whats happening: The character I thought was the main character turns out to be a sidekick to the character I thought was the supporting role. This latter character’s voice is the loudest of all the characters, his story is the one that motivates me to write the novel. Do I scrap my outline and go with the squeaky wheel? How important is getting it done compared with getting it right? Is this what they mean when they say write what you know?

Mark Twain said “write what you know”. If this advice was ever meant to be taken literally he wouldn’t have written A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court or Letters from Earth; Douglas Adams wouldn’t have written The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Stephen King would never have received his handsome advances from his publisher, Umberto Eco coudn’t have delved into 14th century Italy, and Star Wars could never have been as popular as it is across the generations. Writing what you know means writing with insight. Your greatest asset as a writer is one you share with most other humans: the ability to empathise. Combined with an innate love of  story-telling you can transpose your own experiences and those of others onto a single character or situation. For example, I’ve never lived the life of a drifter, but I’ve been without a safe place, I’ve been cold, I’ve been hungry, lonely too. I’ve even known drifters; I listened and watched and used my imagination. Writing is about discovery – of humanity, life, the universe and most especially yourself. We explore so we can know the world better. We should write for the same reason. Here’s a few things to remember about writing what you know:

  • You know more than you think you do
  • Write what you’re comfortable writing
  • Use your powers of observation
  • If you don’t know, ask, interview, research
  • Write to discover

Brutal murders and crumbling ruins

What do the following phrases have in common?

  • unsuspecting victims
  • running fast
  • crumbling ruins
  • close scrutiny
  • terrible tragedy
  • absolutely perfect
  • fully utilise
  • completely happy
  • especially important
  • boundless infinity

and my personal favourites:

  • dead body
  • brutal murder

They’re all pleonasms, that is, they contain redundant words. For example, all victims are unsuspecting, running is fast movement, all tragedies are terrible, dead bodies are corpses, murder is by nature brutal, and so on.

Avoid redundancy, that’s all I’m saying.

Feel free to comment and improve the list.

I can’t sbell

There, I’ve said it. My spelling is atrocious. It’s not a dirty secret, but I feel kind of foolish admitting it. If it wasn’t for my trusty dictionary half of what I write would be unintelligible and the other half would contain made up words. I’m exaggerating, but being a bad speller means time wasted checking words for correct spelling. So far I’ve checkedatrocious and unintelligible (I can never remember if it’s -ible or -able). Generally the -ible, -able rule goes something like this: if the root is not an independent word add -ible, otherwise add -able. Of course like every other linguistic rule in English there are exceptions (irritable, contemptible). For these you just have to memorise the correct spelling. Out of interest, the study of correct spelling is called othrography orthography.

The irony of my terrible spelling is that I have a degree with a minor in linguistics (my major was palaeoanthropology, which I have always been able to spell correctly). Essentially I know all the rules and I have a dozen books, which can remind me, but the bad habits still persist. Mostly that’s all it is – bad habit. I still trip up and write persuit even though I know the correct spelling is pursuit. I try to type as fast as I think so it’s quicker just to tack in mispelled misspelled words and hammer in the correct ones later.

Ultimately spelling in the first draft shouldn’t matter, since you must always edit everything you write. Still, the fact that I frequently stuff up the spelling of simple words irks me.

Fallacy and facts of writing

I’ve been casually exploring the Internet for the past two days, looking in on a sites for writers or by writers. Specifically I’ve been looking at sites dealing with creative writing, which includes all forms of fiction, poetry, creative nonfiction and scriptwriting. One thing I discovered is that there are a some young or novice writers out there who think that published writers form a kind of aristocracy of the writing industry. Our newest recruits suffer the same kind of pressure I remember experiencing as a young writer – how can I compete? Will I be published? Will I ever be good enough? etc - but now because there are more writers, more mediums and more competitors than ever before, the pressure is so much greater.  Most writers will experience a sense of dread, or feel intimidated by the success of other writers during their lifetime. Here I’d like to address some of the myths I’ve come across in the past two days, and hopefully quash them:

Myth: Not everyone can write

Fact: Creative writing is a craft, not a puzzle that only a few geniuses can work out. Writers are a diverse mob; we come from all backgrounds, with different histories, motivation and methods and every single one of us has a unique story. Though some writers might possess a natural flare for creativeness (which is why they write, I suppose), writers are essentially made, not born. It would be truer to say not everyone has the inclination to write creatively.

Myth: You’re not a real writer unless you’ve been published

Fact: In the context of creative writing a writer is someone who habitually engages in the act of creative writing regardless of publication status. The label of writer is not regulated by the publishing industry, it is free of charge to anyone who wishes to use it.

Myth: Having your work published means you’re a good writer

Fact: Publication is a goal to which many writers aspire, and without doubt one of the most exciting experiences for those who chase it, but don’t mistake publication as evidence of writing prowess. Publication is evidence of hard work, guts, persistence and sometimes good fortune.

Myth: Published writers are the experts

Fact: There is no such thing as an expert writer. No single writer knows everything there is to know about creative writing. Each writer has her/his own unique experience and will continue to learn about the craft of writing for as long as she/he performs it. You can be a better writer, but you can’t be the best. Why? Readers are an equally diverse mob. 

If we must use labels I prefer novice, fellow and veteran. Most of us probably fall into the second category: fellow. 

Myth: There must be a secret to writing well

There are no secrets to writing. Writers, like most specialists, use techniques and devices, which anyone can learn. If you want to improve your writing and your chances of being read it pays to learn them. Go to the reference section of any major bookstore and you’ll see a dozen books written by fellow writers and veterans happy to share the information. Better yet, surf the net. There are writers out there willing to impart knowledge of the industry and techniques for free.

Don’t be intimidated if someone has a publication or more writing experience, just be willing to listen and be ready to pass it on.